tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8552303056662924649.post2551198485752602216..comments2017-07-10T21:05:39.554+01:00Comments on Martin Wingfield: Staff meeting & Small is beautifulMartin Wingfieldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14219217662313871409noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8552303056662924649.post-69869991759854334922008-01-08T23:17:00.000+00:002008-01-08T23:17:00.000+00:00Schumacher analysed Man and society through the fi...Schumacher analysed Man and society through the filter of his own somewhat idiosyncratic Christian faith. He was significantly anti-science and, beyond the requirements of his favoured localist economic system, anti-progress.<BR/><BR/>Whether Man can live in the kind of world Schumacher saw as good is a nice question. To my mind, it would be injurious to the creative, high-IQ European spirit in precisely the ways he though it would be beneficial.<BR/><BR/>Economic systems are unproductive when they are scaled to Man only in terms of a supposed simplicity of soul. Not all men are simple of soul, and not all races of men.<BR/><BR/>If the BNP was serious about economics it would look at the Japanese system. Try this:-<BR/><BR/>http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue23/Locke23.htmGuessedworkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09642216100948501067noreply@blogger.com